Pacific Symphony / Vivaldi, Tchaikovsky, Prokofiev / OCR review

A version of Prokofiev’s original ‘Romeo and Juliet” was performed, with a seldom heard happy ending …

Review: Pacific Symphony’s alternative ‘Romeo and Juliet’ is difficult to love. The Orange County Register, April 17, 2015.

7 comments

Do you want to comment?

Comments RSS and TrackBack URI

MarK

So, it seems like The Greatest Expert Of All Arts was right in this case!
Meanwhile, i wonder: is performing Rococo Variations “without virtuoso airs” a good thing necessarily? Doesn’t the piece demand a tastefully virtuosic approach, at least partly and to a reasonable extent?

Permalink, Reply

April 17, 2015 3:50 pm
- tmangan
  
  If you mean Stalin, I think I have to say yes.
  
  I’ll pass on the other part.
  
  Permalink, Reply
  
  April 17, 2015 5:03 pm
  - MarK
    
    Of course that is exactly whom i meant: even mustachioed dictators can, like a proverbial broken clock, be correct sometimes. In this case, Prokofiev must have miscalculated in his desire to appease The Boss, not realizing that He would not like the idea that happy endings were shown as being possible in any society other than the one He chose to promote as exemplary.
    Your “pass” is surprising to me because i am sure that you do have an opinion about this purely musical subject and if so then why not express it, unless of course you are running a political campaign for some kind of elected office in which case not answering certain questions is normal procedure.
    
    Permalink, Reply
    
    April 19, 2015 5:05 pm
chris

Love that picture.

(I did read the review too. Promise.)

Permalink, Reply

April 18, 2015 8:45 pm
kitsunebi

A Stalinist. Who knew?

Permalink, Reply

April 20, 2015 3:22 pm
- MarK
  
  As far as we can tell now, he was never a real “Stalinist”, whatever that means, but after returning to Soviet Russia, he did not have much choice other than at least to appear to be one.
  
  Permalink, Reply
  
  April 20, 2015 4:01 pm
kitsunebi

Agreed. “I think they both [Prokofiev + Shostakovich] understood the full, loathsome wretchedness of the political and ideological system that repressed them. But they weren’t members of an underground resistance – they were composers, they were artists. I think that no matter how much talent they put into their work, it cannot be said of either of them that their compositions represented service to the regime. They served their talent.”
–Alexander Titel, director, Stanislavsky & Nemirovich-Danchenko Musical Theatre (Moscow)

Permalink, Reply

April 20, 2015 9:26 pm