A version of Prokofiev’s original ‘Romeo and Juliet” was performed, with a seldom heard happy ending …
Review: Pacific Symphony’s alternative ‘Romeo and Juliet’ is difficult to love. The Orange County Register, April 17, 2015.
Pacific Symphony / Vivaldi, Tchaikovsky, Prokofiev / OCR review
7 comments
Comments RSS and TrackBack URI
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Support Classical Life
Recent Comments
- MarK on Review: Grazinyte-Tyla, Kopatchinskaja, LA Phil
- Lisa Rachel Hirsch on Review: Grazinyte-Tyla, Kopatchinskaja, LA Phil
- Paul Bodine on Review: Grazinyte-Tyla, Kopatchinskaja, LA Phil
- Paul Bodine on Four books on conductors
- Paul Bodine on Four books on conductors
Blogroll
- Alex Ross: The Rest is Noise
- All is Yar
- Arts & Culture / Voice of OC
- Arts & Letters Daily
- Arts: New York Times
- ArtsJournal: Music
- Classical Voice North America
- Clef Notes
- Composers Doing Normal Shit
- Deceptive Cadence
- Emphasis Dance
- Iron Tongue of Midnight
- Kenneth Woods — A View from the Podium
- Montonous Forest
- Night After Night
- On An Overgrown Path
- Opera Chic
- Opera News
- Out West Arts
- Pacific Symphony blog
- Parterre Box
- Please Enjoy!
- Robert D. Thomas/Class Act
- San Francisco Classical Voice
- Slipped Disc
- Sounds and Fury
- The Misread City
-
Recent Posts
- Review: Grazinyte-Tyla, Kopatchinskaja, LA Phil
- Review: Third Coast Percussion
- Video: ‘Torched and Wrecked’ by David Skidmore
- Pacific Chorale to perform the music of women composers
- A moment of John Adams
- Four scores
- Four books on conductors
- Review: André Previn, Tom Stoppard and ‘Star Trek’
- For André Previn, 1929-2019
- Review: Pacific Symphony’s ‘Madama Butterfly’
Archives
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (5)
- February 2019 (4)
- January 2019 (7)
- December 2018 (4)
- November 2018 (4)
- October 2018 (6)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (7)
- June 2018 (3)
- May 2018 (4)
- April 2018 (3)
- March 2018 (4)
- February 2018 (5)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (5)
- November 2017 (7)
- October 2017 (9)
- September 2017 (10)
- August 2017 (6)
- July 2017 (7)
- June 2017 (12)
- May 2017 (8)
- April 2017 (7)
- March 2017 (11)
- February 2017 (7)
- January 2017 (19)
- December 2016 (11)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (8)
- September 2016 (14)
- August 2016 (10)
- July 2016 (12)
- June 2016 (15)
- May 2016 (18)
- April 2016 (19)
- March 2016 (19)
- February 2016 (20)
- January 2016 (16)
- December 2015 (15)
- November 2015 (17)
- October 2015 (27)
- September 2015 (18)
- August 2015 (10)
- July 2015 (14)
- June 2015 (14)
- May 2015 (16)
- April 2015 (17)
- March 2015 (17)
- February 2015 (17)
- January 2015 (17)
- December 2014 (19)
- November 2014 (21)
- October 2014 (13)
- September 2014 (14)
- August 2014 (11)
- July 2014 (11)
- June 2014 (12)
- May 2014 (16)
- April 2014 (14)
- March 2014 (12)
- February 2014 (14)
- January 2014 (17)
- December 2013 (13)
- November 2013 (19)
- October 2013 (15)
- September 2013 (20)
- August 2013 (11)
- July 2013 (20)
- June 2013 (15)
- May 2013 (17)
- April 2013 (15)
- March 2013 (17)
- February 2013 (13)
- January 2013 (15)
- December 2012 (8)
- November 2012 (14)
- October 2012 (12)
- September 2012 (11)
- August 2012 (8)
- July 2012 (16)
- June 2012 (9)
- May 2012 (12)
- April 2012 (15)
- March 2012 (11)
- February 2012 (16)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (15)
- October 2011 (16)
- September 2011 (14)
- August 2011 (11)
- July 2011 (12)
- June 2011 (15)
- May 2011 (13)
- April 2011 (20)
- March 2011 (13)
- February 2011 (16)
- January 2011 (10)
- December 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (12)
- October 2010 (16)
- September 2010 (14)
- August 2010 (19)
- July 2010 (13)
- February 2010 (1)
- March 2009 (1)
- November 2008 (2)
- March 2006 (1)
Classical Life
So, it seems like The Greatest Expert Of All Arts was right in this case!
Meanwhile, i wonder: is performing Rococo Variations “without virtuoso airs” a good thing necessarily? Doesn’t the piece demand a tastefully virtuosic approach, at least partly and to a reasonable extent?
If you mean Stalin, I think I have to say yes.
I’ll pass on the other part.
Of course that is exactly whom i meant: even mustachioed dictators can, like a proverbial broken clock, be correct sometimes. In this case, Prokofiev must have miscalculated in his desire to appease The Boss, not realizing that He would not like the idea that happy endings were shown as being possible in any society other than the one He chose to promote as exemplary.
Your “pass” is surprising to me because i am sure that you do have an opinion about this purely musical subject and if so then why not express it, unless of course you are running a political campaign for some kind of elected office in which case not answering certain questions is normal procedure.
Love that picture.
(I did read the review too. Promise.)
A Stalinist. Who knew?
As far as we can tell now, he was never a real “Stalinist”, whatever that means, but after returning to Soviet Russia, he did not have much choice other than at least to appear to be one.
Agreed. “I think they both [Prokofiev + Shostakovich] understood the full, loathsome wretchedness of the political and ideological system that repressed them. But they weren’t members of an underground resistance – they were composers, they were artists. I think that no matter how much talent they put into their work, it cannot be said of either of them that their compositions represented service to the regime. They served their talent.”
–Alexander Titel, director, Stanislavsky & Nemirovich-Danchenko Musical Theatre (Moscow)