I read the following in last night’s program booklet:
“Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827) was a German composer and pianist. A crucial figure in the transition between the Classical and the Romantic eras in Western art music, he remains one of the most famous and influential of all composers. His best known compositions include 9 symphonies, 5 concertos for piano, 32 piano sonatas, and 16 string quartets. He also composed other chamber music, choral works (including the celebrated Missa Solemnis), and songs.”
Oh yeah, that Beethoven.
Is it just me, or is this too basic? For those who already know Beethoven, it’s all but useless, maybe even a little insulting. For the uninitiated, it seems to me, it must be close to meaningless. If you don’t know who Beethoven is, then you don’t know what “Classical” and “Romantic” means, you don’t know what a concerto is, or why someone who composed 16 string quartets should be famous. Is it hard to write a string quartet or something? And is someone of that uninitiated ilk (not that there’s anything wrong with it) likely to be at the concert reading said program note?
Imagine a similar note at a Rolling Stones concert:
“Mick Jagger (1915-) is a famous British singer and frontman of the Rolling Stones. A crucial figure in the triumph of pop culture over everything, he remains one of the most famous and influential musicians of all the Rolling Stones. He is best known for singing “Satisfaction,” “Jumpin’ Jack Flash,” and other Stones hits, for wiggling his fanny during live performances and for his prodigious lips. He has also written 16 string quartets.”
My own opinion on writing program notes is that the writer should skip the biography of the composer (except when said composer is widely unknown) and concentrate on the biography (so to speak) of the piece that is about to be performed. And keep it brief, if possible.
I’m with you, Mr. Mangan. Program notes generally should assume that the reader wants to learn a little bit more about what makes the music they’re about to hear something they should want to hear, and learn a little bit about why that may be so. It takes hard work, a lot thinking, and a good editor. Program notes should not assume that you know nothing. Someone in the audience may indeed not know anything about Beethoven, but what’s the percentage of that? I think a lot annotators just haven’t given themselves time to craft a good piece of writing, and rather, follow what is often seen in program books, which is what you quoted. In defense, we might suppose that this author was told “Keep it to 50 words, and write it yesterday” in which case, well… that might be the best one can do.
Nice post, Friend.
Good points, Max. I should have said that what I have quoted is not the entire program note on the Beethoven sonata that was played. The writer went on to say some helpful things on the piece. But I don’t think he or she should have started with what I quoted.
Good thoughts.
If Mick Jagger was born in 1915, when was Keith Richards born, 1879?
A joke, of course.