In today’s Orange County Register online, I review last night’s performance by Riccardo Muti and the Chicago Symphony in Segerstrom Concert Hall. This review will not appear in print.
Advertisements
Chicago Symphony, Riccardo Muti perform in Costa Mesa
Support Classical Life
Recent Comments
- MarK on Video: Jacques Casterede: ‘Menage a trois’
- tmangan on Pacific Symphony’s 2017-18 classical music season (including trip to Carnegie Hall)
- bobtatfore on Pacific Symphony’s 2017-18 classical music season (including trip to Carnegie Hall)
- tmangan on Video: Jacques Casterede: ‘Menage a trois’
- MarK on Video: Jacques Casterede: ‘Menage a trois’
Blogroll
- All is Yar
- Arts & Letters Daily
- ArtsBeat: New York Times
- ArtsJournal
- Blognoggle Classical Music
- Classical Voice North America
- Clef Notes
- Composers Doing Normal Shit
- Deceptive Cadence
- Emphasis Dance
- Iron Tongue of Midnight
- Kenneth Woods — A View from the Podium
- Montonous Forest
- Night After Night
- On An Overgrown Path
- Opera Chic
- Opera News
- Out West Arts
- Pacific Symphony blog
- Parterre Box
- Please Enjoy!
- Robert D. Thomas/Class Act
- San Francisco Classical Voice
- Slipped Disc
- Sounds and Fury
- The Detritus Review
- The Misread City
- The Rest is Noise
-
Recent Posts
- The state of music criticism
- Pacific Symphony’s 2017-18 classical music season (including trip to Carnegie Hall)
- Video: Jacques Casterede: ‘Menage a trois’
- Boosting arts coverage with your smart phone
- Van Cliburn winner to perform with Pacific Symphony
- Lesson Eight: Motivation and nerves
- Lesson Seven: Eclipse and flow
- Lessons Five and Six: Pain and gain
- Monster of a movie: Kaufman and Pacific Symphony take on ‘Jurassic Park’
- Video: Gulda plays Bach
Archives
- September 2017 (6)
- August 2017 (6)
- July 2017 (7)
- June 2017 (12)
- May 2017 (8)
- April 2017 (7)
- March 2017 (11)
- February 2017 (7)
- January 2017 (19)
- December 2016 (11)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (8)
- September 2016 (14)
- August 2016 (10)
- July 2016 (12)
- June 2016 (15)
- May 2016 (18)
- April 2016 (19)
- March 2016 (19)
- February 2016 (20)
- January 2016 (16)
- December 2015 (15)
- November 2015 (17)
- October 2015 (27)
- September 2015 (18)
- August 2015 (10)
- July 2015 (14)
- June 2015 (14)
- May 2015 (16)
- April 2015 (17)
- March 2015 (17)
- February 2015 (17)
- January 2015 (17)
- December 2014 (19)
- November 2014 (21)
- October 2014 (13)
- September 2014 (14)
- August 2014 (11)
- July 2014 (11)
- June 2014 (12)
- May 2014 (16)
- April 2014 (14)
- March 2014 (12)
- February 2014 (14)
- January 2014 (17)
- December 2013 (13)
- November 2013 (19)
- October 2013 (15)
- September 2013 (20)
- August 2013 (11)
- July 2013 (20)
- June 2013 (15)
- May 2013 (17)
- April 2013 (15)
- March 2013 (17)
- February 2013 (13)
- January 2013 (15)
- December 2012 (8)
- November 2012 (14)
- October 2012 (12)
- September 2012 (11)
- August 2012 (8)
- July 2012 (16)
- June 2012 (9)
- May 2012 (12)
- April 2012 (15)
- March 2012 (11)
- February 2012 (16)
- January 2012 (13)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (15)
- October 2011 (16)
- September 2011 (14)
- August 2011 (11)
- July 2011 (12)
- June 2011 (15)
- May 2011 (13)
- April 2011 (20)
- March 2011 (13)
- February 2011 (16)
- January 2011 (10)
- December 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (12)
- October 2010 (16)
- September 2010 (14)
- August 2010 (19)
- July 2010 (13)
- February 2010 (1)
- March 2009 (1)
- November 2008 (2)
- March 2006 (1)
Classical Life
Agreed. Quite a performance. I loved it.
“This review will not appear in print” Huh? One of the best orchestras in the world makes its first appearance in OC in over 20 years and the paper won’t print the review?
There’s no room at the inn on Mondays anymore. There will be a refer in the paper Sunday to my online review. That’s all I can say.
Sad but not unique. A couple of weeks ago one of the world’s leading violinists played a recital in the WDCH and, as far as i can tell, there was not a single reviewing word about it in LA Times – neither in print nor online.
It’s a difficult situation. Newspapers shrink, staffs shrink, choices are made on what to cover. Also, to save money, newspapers cut down on the number of pages in their print editions. Some articles, therefore, end up online only. With classical music articles and reviews, though, the big readership (relatively speaking) is still in print, not online. Though that is probably (slowly) changing.
Yes Tim, i know all that, but i am talking here of a case when a major recital of an outstanding soloist was completely ignored both in print AND online.
By the way – thanks for a very fine review of Chicago Symphony with Muti!
You’re welcome, MarK (for the review).
I believe you must be talking about Joshua Bell (regarding the lack of review). That’s probably both a staffing issue and a freelance money issue. That’s an educated guess.
btw, Joshua Bell played in O.C. last week, too, and I was unable to go. I did see him at the airport, though. I even got that event into my celebrity slideshow!
On the subject of what to cover, Tim, I must observe that you seemed unaware of a small series of symphonic concerts to the immediate northeast of OC in which one conductor led two orchestras in nine completed symphonies (and more) by a single composer whose (death) anniversary was observed last year. What restraint on your part!
I was very aware of it. Perhaps you are unaware of my other full-time duties at the newspaper? Also, the newspaper doesn’t want me to cover L.A. anymore. So, I must pick and choose carefully what I do on my own time and my own dime. The Mahler Project just didn’t fit in for me in January. It was extremely frustrating, but there it is.
I fully understand the circumstances, just find it frustrating that your talents are being constrained. Also a little jealous that you got the CSO and we didn’t!
I have enjoyed your end-of-week posts on the celebrity scene; I guess I should read more of what you DO write and worry less about what you do NOT!
I just want readers to know that I’m doing what I can, and often much more, with the music criticism part of my job. Not to pat myself on the back; but still, I don’t want readers to think I’m not interested. I’d rather be a music critic.
The celebrity stuff I write is taking on a life of its own. I now appear live on the Larry Elder radio show, every Friday night. My column appears every day on Page 2 of the newspaper. Yikes. Readers also seem to like what I’m doing in that sphere. I get fan letters. (Yikes redux.) Oh well, I’m doing the best I can (which I have to say, isn’t all that great), trying to have some fun with it.
Oops. Make that northwest!
My column appears every day on Page 2 of the newspaper. Yikes. Readers also seem to like what I’m doing in that sphere.
Oh, well. So instead of some Mahler in LA, you’re relegated to covering the trials and tribulations of, say, Madonna or Matt Damon. Celebrities who perhaps are even geographically farther away from your beat (or that of the OC Register in general) than Gustavo Dudamel and his band.
If an orchestra in Los Angeles isn’t local enough for your employer, at least a recent major story, which certainly falls in the “showbiz” category of your main column, can be localized. I’ve read that pop icon Whitney Houston back in 2006 apparently sought the care of a drug counselor based in the Laguna Niguel area and relocated there from Atlanta. So she was hanging around the OC for a few years. The counselor, by the way, was photographed at Ms. Houston’s funeral on Saturday, assisting the late singer’s daughter. If he’s still operating in the Laguna area, and if it’s true that the daughter will require counseling of her own, then there’s a possible local angle for you and the Register. Not exactly as uplifting as Mahler and Dudamel, or Riccardo Muti and the CSO, but it’s something.